Colloque « Anthropologie des cultures globalisées. Terrains complexes et enjeux disciplinaires » Québec, 7-11 novembre 2007
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le colloque international « Anthropologie des cultures globalisées. Terrains complexes et enjeux disciplinaires », qui s’est tenu du 7 au 11 novembre 2007 à Québec (Canada), a tenté de faire un état des lieux du savoir anthropologique actuel sur la globalisation culturelle, à partir de l’apport francophone. Ce texte vise à la fois à rendre compte de ce colloque, à recadrer plus largement la problématique qui unit globalisation, culture et anthropologie et à en discuter les perspectives théoriques et méthodologiques. Quatre modèles théoriques principaux sont présentés qui permettent de comprendre pourquoi la mondialisation des formes culturelles provoque le paradoxe de générer à la fois une homogénéisation et une fragmentation. Méthodologiquement, la conversion à une ethnographie multisite n’implique pas nécessairement de renoncer à une entrée localisée qui rende compte de l’intérieur et concrètement des processus de globalisation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".