Programming cochlear implant stimulation levels in infants and children with a combination of objective measures
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a method of obtaining audible and comfortable stimulation levels with the use of objective measures when reliable behavioral testing is not possible. Electrically evoked compound action potentials of the auditory nerve (ECAPs) and stapedius reflex (ESR) thresholds were measured in 68 children who use Nucleus devices, beginning at implantation in the operating room (OR) and continuing over the first year of implant use at three implant electrodes. Generic correction factors based on group data were subtracted from ECAP thresholds obtained in the OR. The correction factors were specified for two groups of electrodes and two age groups of children. Objective thresholds exceeded behavioral values in 75% of children and were lower than minimum ESR thresholds in 85% of children. Mean dynamic ranges between the two objective measures spanned 23-36 Clinical Units across the implanted array. Maximum levels, based on ESR thresholds measured in the OR, can be globally adjusted to maintain comfortable stimulation levels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it