MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W330247759 · doi:10.3138/cjfs.12.2.46

“Non-Theatrical with Dreams of Theatrical”: Paradoxes of a Canadian Semi-Documentary <i>Film Noir</i>

2003· article· fr· W330247759 on OpenAlex
Zoë Druick

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Film Studies · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCinema and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le contexte de production et la complexité formelle du semi-documentaire de l'ONF File 1365 : The Connors Case (1947) reflètent l'angoisse de la guerre froide et, en particulier, l'inquiétude des employés de l'ONF qui étaient constamment sous surveillance policière à l'époque. Ce film présente un amalgame typiquement canadien de campagne de recrutement pour la GRC, de documentaire sur les procédures policières et de film à suspense. En faisant référence au film noir semi-documentaire hollywoodien, l'auteure suggère que File 1365 est un documentaire noir. Bien que ses excès esthétiques et son contexte politique aient relégué ce film aux oubliettes, son hybridlté formelle exprime plusieurs des questions sociales et politiques les plus importantes de cette époque laissée-pour-compte de l'histoire canadienne.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.541
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it