MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W330604086

Seismic Parameters of Impactites from Physical Property Variations - Results from Bosumtwi Borehole Logs

2006· article· en· W330604086 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth L’Heureux, Hernan Ugalde, B. Milkereit

Bibliographic record

VenueLPI · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyBoreholeLithologyImpact craterScale (ratio)Property (philosophy)GeophysicsImpact structureSeismologyGeotechnical engineeringCartographyPaleontologyGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Physical property logs provide an important ground-truthing tool in the analysis of geophysical data. For impact studies, the statistical properties of these data series can provide an important link between structures in different parts of the world, characterized by different lithologies, morphologies, or target rock types. These properties serve to answer the question of exactly how heterogeneous or homogeneous the different impact sequences are, in particular for the footwall structures relative to impactite layers. To describe small scale heterogeneity in the various sections of the Bosumtwi crater we used the approach first described by Goff and Jordan [4], which approximates the covariance of the stochastic variations in physical properties by a von Karman function in 1-D:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLPISame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207