MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W331007654 · doi:10.4000/lidil.3114

Rapports aux textes virtuels en formation de lettres : vers une nouvelle écriture professionnelle

2011· article· fr· W331007654 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLidil · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La littératie étendue correspond à des écritures générant la gestion de plusieurs contraintes. Les textes numérisés et les hypertextes exigent du scripteur des macrohabiletés textuelles et discursives qui nécessitent des formations. Un rapide historique rappelle les éléments principaux de cette révolution et leurs conséquences dans le domaine scolaire. La rupture est également abordée en interrogeant les enjeux pragmatiques et énonciatifs des hypertextes. Les comportements des enseignants de lettres face à cette nouvelle réalité professionnelle sont appréhendés au moyen d’un questionnaire. Il s’avère que les enseignants ont peu investi ce domaine. Les résultats sont discutés par une mise en perspective anthropologique entre technique et écriture et en s’interrogeant également sur l’enseignement de l’écriture de haut niveau en milieu universitaire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.771
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it