MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in timing of metamorphosis in the common frog Rana temporaria

2000· article· en· W331009064 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEcoscience · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersVetenskapsrådet
KeywordsMetamorphosisBiologyPhenotypic plasticityLarvaRanaAdaptation (eye)Developmental plasticityZoologyEcologyPlasticityAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unpredictable environments are expected to select for adaptive plasticity in traits enabling adjustment of phenotype to prevailing environmental conditions. Common frogs (Rana temporaria) breed frequently in ponds, which dry up before the aquatic larvae have metamorphosed, and consequently, plasticity in timing of metamorphosis in response to pond drying could be adaptive. We investigated the responses of half- and full-sib R. temporaria larvae to simulated pond drying in a factorial experiment to test whether there is adaptive phenotypic plasticity in timing of metamorphosis, and whether this plasticity is genetically determined. As expected under the adaptive hypothesis, we found that larvae exposed to the decreasing water treatment metamorphosed significantly faster than their sibs in the constant water treatments. Furthermore, age and size at metamorphosis were positively correlated in the constant water treatments, but negatively correlated in the decreasing water treatment. However, larvae from decreasing water treatment metamorphosed, on average, at a smaller size as compared to larvae from the constant water treatments, even after controlling for variation in developmental time. Since smaller size at metamorphosis is likely to be related to reduced fitness, this indicates that faster development may trade off with other components of fitness. The results further show that the amount of food received during the four first days of development influenced age and size at metamorphosis, reinforcing the view that early life nutrition may have a significant impact on later life fitness. Although there was a genetic component to developmental rates, we found no evidence for genetic variation in plasticity. In accordance with evidence from other studies, our results suggest existence of adaptive phenotypic plasticity in amphibian development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it