MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W331136598

Detection of long-period variations in the subdwarf B star PG 0101+039 on the basis of MOST photometry.

2006· article· en· W331136598 on OpenAlexaffabout
S. K. Randall, J. M. Matthews, G. Fontaine, P. Brassard, Jason F. Rowe, R. Kuschnig

Bibliographic record

VenueMmSAI · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubdwarfPhotometry (optics)AstrophysicsVariable starPhysicsAmplitudeAstronomyObservableAdiabatic processStarsWhite dwarfOptics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the results of ∼ 400 hours of optical wide-band photometry for the long-period variable subdwarf B (sdB) star PG 0101+039 obtained by MOST, Canada’s first orbiting space telescope, in September/October 2004. Despite the relative faintness of the target, the observations uncovered three low-amplitude periodicities between 2600 and 7250 s attributed to intrinsic stellar pulsations, as well as an ellipsoidal deformation of the subdwarf due to its close binary status. The fact that slow pulsations were detected in a target as hot as PG 0101+039 is in conflict with current non-adiabatic theory, which only predicts the excitation of more rapid oscillations that have amplitudes too small to be observable when integrating over the visible disk of the star. In light of our findings we will thus have to reconsider our models and refine their construction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMmSAI→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→