World Distribution Protocol for Support of Scalable General Purpose Distributed Virtual Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
General purpose distributed virtual environments (DVEs) require more rigorous architecture design than those of case specific environments. Several world distribution methods have been developed for specific usage in various vehicletraining simulators. The VPMS project at the University of Windsor is concerned, in part, with investigating strategies for design and implementation of a system, which adapts existing world distribution protocols for general purpose DVEs. In context of these protocols, the world is partitioned based on physical proximity in the virtual world; databases for a given part of the world are established and maintained locally. One obstacle that needs to be overcome is the size difference of the area of influence (AOI) of a given entity. Since AOI size varies for different entity types, as occurs in aircraft training involving group based entities, existing schemes which fix AOI size are inappropriate to deal with the issues and requirements of modem, distributed modelling, visualization and collaboration contexts and, therefore, new schemes must be developed. Some approaches to this problem are described and design considerations for a general-purpose system are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".