Law-economics Analysis for the Restriction of Intellectual Property Rights ANALYSE DE LA RESTRICTION DU DROIT DE PROPRIÉTÉ INTELLECTUELLE SUR LA MÉTHODE DE DROIT-ÉCONOMIE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: restriction of Intellectual property rights, as an important principle and system in the Intellectual property law, has its own existence of the reasonable economic basis. This thesis begins with the definition of intellectual asset rights, reveals that the intellectual asset has the double properties of private products and public products, and demonstrates the rationality of moderate private right protection. And then it revises the economic senses in the intellectual property system using the method of economic analysis, and analyzes the important role which intrinsic balance mechanism and exterior restriction mechanism play, to guarantee information resource configured liquidly and carried on effectively. Key words: Law-economics, Restriction of intellectual property rights, Pareto criterion Resume: En tant que le principe et l'institution importants du droit de propriete intellectuelle, la restriction du droit de propriete intellectuelle existe sur la base rationnelle de la science economique. Je commence dans cette these par la delimitation du droit de propriete intellectuelle afin de decouvrir sa double caracteristique: produit prive et produit public, et d'argumenter la rationalite de le proteger mesurement comme le droit prive. Et ensuite, j'etudie la raison economique de l'institution du droit de propriete intellectuelle, au moyen d'analyse economique, et j'explique l'importance de son mecanisme equilibre a l'interieur et son mecanisme restreint a l'exterieur pour assurer la distribution facile et la fonction effective des resources informatiques. Mots-Cles: droit-economie, restriction du droit de propriete intellectuelle, critere de PARETO 1. INTRODUCTION There are many important economic meanings behind law, no matter whether the legislators realize the meaning consciously or not, law-economics or so called economic analysis law came about and owned more and more people's attentions after experiencing certain developing periods. As for what the law-economics is, so far there does not only exist a definition that is widely accepted by the public, but also by very famous scholars such as Richard · A · Posner, Robert · Kart and Thomas · Youln who have not given a definition to the law-economics. 2 Although law-economics has both extensive meaning and profound content, the substance of law-economics_still emphasizes the society's interest and benefit related to legal system, which researches and studies for this subject are conducted from the economic position. It advocates that law should minimize the social cost in the rights' definition. That is, it requires law should choose a kind of right configuration and implementation procedure which have a lower cost. It provides us a way to know and evaluate the intellectual property rights system according to the principle of efficiency. author uses the method of economic analysis to revise whether the intellectual property system contains the reasonable economic senses and to analyze the important role which intrinsic balance mechanism and exterior limit mechanism plays for guarantying information resource configured liquidly and carried on effectively. 2. PROPERTY RIGHT DEFINITION OF KNOWLEDGE ASSETS definition of The Intellectual Property Rights was brought in from aboard when China joined in the World Property Right Organization at the end of 70 's in 19th century. Intellectual Property has two meanings at least. One is knowledge product or knowledge asset, the essential factor of product or the valuable goods which is so called knowledge property. other is intellectual property rights itself. Property is defined based on knowledge produce, a kind of intangible asset, and derived from the economist's classification of public product and personal product, thus it is necessary to begin with this classification. 2.1 Personal Product and Public Product economists classify personal product and public product is based on whether the expense or the use of product that has exclusiveness. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".