MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W331823307

Health in Rural Canada

2012· article· en· W331823307 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Silvia Straka

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Workforce Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRural historyRural areaRural sociologyIndigenousRural managementRural healthResource (disambiguation)Economic growthPolitical scienceSociologyPublic relationsGeographyRural developmentAgricultureLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Health in Rural Canada Judith C. Kulig, Allison M. Williams Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press, 2012.Health in Rural Canada is an interdisciplinary collection that brings together the most current research on rural, remote, and Indigenous communities. As the first comprehensive volume of its kind, it provides a much-needed resource for policy researchers, educators, students, policy makers, and professionals concerned with rural Canadian issues. There is a great deal of breadth in this book, which presents research across Canada (although some provinces/territories are under-represented). Similarly, the authors represent a wide range of disciplines. The 27 chapters are organized into seven sections (rural status, rural human resources, rural services delivery, rural policy and research, rural issues, First Nations in rural settings, and aging in rural contexts).This book is a valuable resource simply for having compiled all this current research in one place. However, it also makes an important contribution by offering new lenses through which to understand the research as well as explore its meanings for rural communities. The book seeks to create a paradigm shift, moving away from the dominant medical model preoccupied with deficits and expert solutions. Instead, it focuses on the strengths and resiliencies of rural communities as a means of addressing the gaps, deficits and challenges of various rural areas. The authors clearly advocate for solutions to come from those living in rural communities - the people in the best position to define the problems and their solutions. Policy approaches should be grounded in community strengths and resiliencies, grassroots approaches, and the diverse identities of rural inhabitants.These ideas are all contained within the theme of health and place (developed in Chapter 1) and its three sub-themes, which provide the book's unifying framework. The first emphasizes the dynamic aspects of and place, as many factors (i.e., social, economic, environmental, policy-related) affecting rural communities are continually creating change with potential impacts. The second sub-theme highlights the uniqueness and heterogeneity of rural place. Diversity is considered with respect to gender, sexuality, different cultural groups, and socio-economic status, with a particular focus on Indigenous peoples and older adults. Finally, the third sub-theme looks at urban-rural differences. This urban-rural comparison is especially useful for readers more familiar with research on urban populations. Chapters 2 and 3 survey the rural research and the rural-urban gap respectively. Chapter 4 discusses variations in the provision and utilization of rural services. Together, these chapters provide a comprehensive and current overview of Canadian research.The second part of the book examines the difficulties of recruiting and retaining the rural human resources needed for communities to work out their own solutions. Chapter 5 calls for improved human resource planning models to address important disparities in the geographic distribution of professionals. Chapter 6 proposes an innovative, multisectorial model for a rural training institute, drawing on interdisciplinary partnerships between education and practice settings. The following chapter then proposes continuing education as a means of recruitment, retention, and capacity building. Lastly, Chapter 8 suggests the benefits of a more community-based and holistic approach to mental services rather than the individualistic medical model predominant in urban settings.The next section, on rural services delivery, emphasizes the theme of collaboration across sectors, disciplines, and jurisdictions. Chapter 9 discusses the essential role that such collaborations can have on improving access to services, while Chapter 10 addresses new technologies in rural services. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score0.469

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0110.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.405 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGlobal Health Workforce Issues→French-language works237,207→