Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé : Notre étude a pour objectif de lever un malentendu concernant l’appropriation herméneutique de la philosophie platonicienne par H.-G. Gadamer. On suggère couramment que la lecture que propose Gadamer du corpus platonicien, ou bien évacue son caractère métaphysique, en y privilégiant la mobilité du dialogue sur les thèses qui s’y développent, ou bien assimile l’aspect métaphysique du platonisme à l’oubli du langage que condamne la dernière partie de Vérité et Méthode . En réponse à ces deux grilles d’interprétation, nous proposons d’examiner les vues de Gadamer sur la métaphysique platonicienne du Beau, afin de mettre en lumière le lien positif qu’entretient l’herméneutique avec un certain aspect de la métaphysique de Platon et a fortiori avec la tradition métaphysique en général.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it