MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W331887839 · doi:10.3138/cjfs.14.2.18

The Best Picture ever made in Canada? Thunder Bay Films Limited and the Devil Bear

2005· article· fr· W331887839 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Michel S. Beaulieu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Film Studies · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThunderHistoryArt historyArtHumanitiesEthnologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article trace la brève mais tumultueuse histoire de la Thunder Bay Film Limited, une compagnie de production cinématographique professionnelle établie en 1927 dans la ville qui est aujourd’hui Thunder Bay, en Ontario. On pourrait interpréter la création de cette compagnie soit comme une manigance pour circonvenir au “British Cinematograph Act”, soit comme tentative vaillante mais futile de donner naissance à une industrie locale. Mais ces hypothèses ne rendent pas compte de la ferveur des gens de la région. Les productions de la Thunder Bay Film témoignent en fait d’une croyance régionale dans la modernité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Film StudiesSame topicFrench Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207