Resultados de la encuesta de percepción entre ciudadanos estadounidenses y canadienses residentes en México
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work presents the design of a novel compliant steerable tip (CST) instrument to facilitate transcanal (or totally) endoscopic ear surgery (TEES). The evolution of the instrument's design is shown, where prototypes were evaluated by surgeons and their feedback was used to inform the design changes for the next prototype iteration. The final prototype enables the surgeon to articulate the compliant tip to achieve the desired bending curvature while automatically locking in place and providing dissection and suction capabilities. Pre-clinical validation testing was performed in goat and human cadaver models by two surgeons who successfully removed an allograft from the middle ear. Time and the number of blockages while suctioning saline in both cadaver models were measured and compared with current instruments used during TEES. The CST took significantly less time to suction saline within a flooded middle ear compared to the Panetti suction dissector (PSD) for atticus and underwent less blockages than the PSD for atticus, ear drum and sinus tympani instruments, Wilcoxon Method <i>p</i> < .05. Our study demonstrates the development and successful clinical evaluation of a minimally invasive surgical instrument designed to facilitate endoscopic approaches to the ear.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it