MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The adaptive response to 3‐methylcholanthrene is altered in the liver of adrenalectomized rats

2009· article· en· W33198408 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Anne K. Mullen Grey, David S. Riddick

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsAryl hydrocarbon receptorInternal medicineEndocrinologyMethylcholanthreneMessenger RNAIn vivoChemistryCytochrome P450AdrenalectomyGene expressionCarcinogenTranscription factorBiologyMedicineGeneMetabolismBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is a ligand‐activated transcription factor that mediates most effects of aromatic hydrocarbons, such as 3‐methylcholanthrene (MC). The in vivo regulation of hepatic AHR and whether changes in AHR levels affect the response to agonists are not fully understood. We discovered that the level of hepatic AHR protein was decreased in male adrenalectomized (ADX) rats 4 days after surgery. We studied the consequences of this AHR depletion by measuring expression of aromatic hydrocarbon‐responsive genes in the liver of MC‐treated ADX and SHAM‐operated rats at 6 and 54 h post‐MC. Hepatic AHR protein was depleted in ADX rats at 4 days, but not 6 days, post‐surgery. At this later time point, MC increased hepatic AHR protein in ADX but not SHAM rats. Hepatic cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1), AHR and P450 reductase (CYPRED) mRNA was induced by MC to a greater extent in SHAM versus ADX rats at 6 h. At 54 h post‐MC, induction by MC was greater in ADX versus SHAM rats for CYP1A1 and CYPRED mRNA. CYP1A1 protein levels corresponded to its mRNA. These results suggest that the adaptive response to MC in liver of ADX rats is impaired at 6 h but sustained and enhanced at 54 h relative to SHAM. Changes in the level of hepatic AHR caused by ADX affect the magnitude and duration of the response to aromatic hydrocarbons in vivo in a gene‐dependent manner. [Support: CIHR; OGS; U of Toronto; Peterborough K.M. Hunter Studentship]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicDiet and metabolism studies→French-language works237,207→