MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W33262381 · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-77823-3

Incorporating deadline scheduling into DCCP

2013· dissertation· en· W33262381 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Daniel V. Wilson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsNetwork packetComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Computer networkRound-robin schedulingDistributed computingDynamic priority schedulingQuality of serviceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In current TCP, UDP and DCCP networks, the finite nature of real time data is not taken into consideration when scheduling of packets occurs on intermediate devices. To overcome this, the research presented in this thesis incorporates deadline scheduling into DCCP. This allows packet age information to be transferred by the DCCP protocol which provides intermediate devices with the ability to make more informed transportation decisions for real time data. By embedding two variables, in the form of options into DCCP-Data packets, a number of new prioritization and scheduling mechanisms that utilize packet age information are made possible. This thesis will show how deadline scheduling is incorporated into DCCP in a stable, backward compatible and DCCP standard complaint manner. \n \nOnce deadline scheduling is incorporated into DCCP, the focus of the thesis then shifts towards mechanisms that can be implemented on intermediate devices that make use of the packet life information. To begin, five unique packet discard mechanisms that purge stale packets from the network are presented. The purpose of these mechanisms is to remove stale packets from the network using intermediate devices in the network in order to free network resources for non stale packets utilizing the same infrastructure. Experimentation carried out to investigate the efficiency and benefits to DCCP performance offered by each of these five mechanisms is shown. The experimentation also explores fairness amongst competing flows when the mechanisms are activated. \n \nFollowing this, a novel probabilistic scheduling (PBS) mechanism is introduced that predicts the probability a packet has of arriving at its intended destination net- work within its useful lifespan. Once this probability is calculated scheduling decisions are then made based on this value in order to offer optimized delivery to real time data. In order to calculate this probability, the PBS mechanism utilizes metrics from the Cisco EIGRP routing protocol. Experiments carried out using the PBS mechanism demonstrate that the PBS mechanism improves DCCP performance in networks where high levels of stale packets occur. \n \nOverall, this research presents a new approach to the transportation of real time data in DCCP networks and aims to improve DCCP adoption through the improved performance capability added to the protocol by this research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207