MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W332673965

Native America, Discovered and Conquered: Thomas Jefferson, Lewis & Clark, and Manifest Destiny

2012· article· en· W332673965 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Jerry Hammersmith

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œinnovation journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Natural History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMillerManifest destinyDoctrineLawPoliticsPossession (linguistics)SovereigntyHistorySociologyPolitical sciencePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Robert J. Miller Native America, Discovered and Conquered: Thomas Jefferson, Lewis & Clark, and Manifest Destiny Westport, CT: Praeger Press, 2006Reviewed by Jerry HammersmithIn his review of this book in Ground Swell, Dr. William Batt of Albany, NY says:Author Robert J. Miller, an Associate Professor at the Lewis & Clark Law School in Portland, Oregon, as well as being Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Confederated Tribes of the Grande Ronde Community of Oregon, is a citizen of the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma. In this book, he moves outside of the Eurocentric paradigm of conventional legal reasoning characterizing so much of U.S. and Canadian notions of real property. Miller presents a tightly written challenge to five hundred years of this tradition. He argues (p.175) that American history and law can take on a richer meaning and understanding within the contexts of the legal background and justifications for many historical, law related and political principles.This reviewer argues that the same observations are as true of Canada and other colonial states as they are of the U.S.A. In both the U.S.A. and Canada, the Doctrine of Discovery was explicit-finders, keepers.Although Miller's book is six years old, carries some messages of current application not only for the U.S.A., but also for Canada. Beginning with popes in the 11th century, the Doctrine of Discovery was widely understood by the time North America was being invaded and occupied by Europeans. England initially claimed sovereign possession of most of the continent, assuring that land titles came directly from the King's grace. Batt continues:Miller outlines ten elements to the Doctrine of Discovery (pp. 6 - 8):1. First Discovery;2. Actual Occupancy and Current Possession;3. Preemption/European title;4. Indian title;5. Tribal limited sovereign and commercial right;6. Contiguity;7. Terra nullius;8. Christianity;9. Civilization;10. Conquest.This reviewer adds that although, following George III's Royal Proclamation of 1763, immigrants in the U.S.A. responded with a revolution while immigrants in Canada did not, in both cases Europeans and their descendents claimed property and sovereign right over Indigenous lands. First discovery was considered to create a claim, even if considered incomplete, of title. In what was to become the U.S.A., a revolution was fought over whether the British Crown or Immigrants' Institutions would claim title to Indigenous lands and resources. In what was to become Canada, immigrants stayed loyal to the Crown and treaties were negotiated between the Crown, in the right of Canada, and Indigenous Nations.Thomas Jefferson, in the U.S.A., like Sir John A. MacDonald at a shortly later time in Canada, envisioned a trans-continental nation well before many of his compatriots did. This makes them each a pivotal figure in the history of his nation.This reviewer agrees with reviewer Dr. Batt that Robert Miller is too sophisticated a scholar to use contemporary political beliefs as a basis on which to judge values and practices two centuries ago. Still we must understand Jefferson and MacDonald, as products of their time, in revisionary light.Batt observes that Miller recognizes that in the U.S.A. the legacy of treaties as well as statutory and case law leaves parties as seeing themselves locked into a cul-de-sac, limiting flexibility to rectify past injustices. This reviewer observes that while much of the same is also true in Canada, the courts up to and including the Supreme Court of Canada, have occasionally and unpredictably shown a willingness to rectify past injustices.As Batt points out, Miller begins his book by proposing that it is time for the United States to try to undo more than 200 years of the application of the ethnocentrically, racially and religiously inspired Doctrine of Discovery to American Indians and nations (p. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.008
Scholarly communication0.0080.008
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œinnovation journalSame topicArchaeology and Natural HistoryFrench-language works237,207