MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W332708194 · doi:10.4000/extremeorient.220

Des patriarches aux pieds d’argile

2012· article· fr· W332708194 on OpenAlex
Emmanuel Lozerand

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueExtrême-Orient Extrême-Occident · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsCégep de Jonquière
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le nouvel État-nation japonais a tenté d’instituer à partir des années 1890 une idéologie officielle visant à faire du chef et père de famille la source et le modèle du pouvoir politique.Pourtant, si l’on quitte les discours officiels pour s’engager dans les méandres du code civil de 1898 par exemple, ou plus encore pour prêter l’oreille à ce qu’expriment les écrivains de l’époque, on sera surpris de rencontrer, bien loin de l’idéal figé du patriarche imposant, d’autres pères, souvent tendres et fragiles, quand ils ne sont pas totalement défaillants.La véhémence de l’affirmation patriarcale dans le Japon moderne doit-elle être lue comme l’expression naturelle d’une caractéristique sociale ou culturelle, ou au contraire comme un effort, à certains égards vain et pathétique, pour essayer d’instituer une autorité paternelle qui n’a cessé en réalité de lui faire défaut ?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.727
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.235
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it