MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W332968958 · doi:10.4000/aspd.869

1. Politique du secrétariat d’Etat a l’économie en matière de promotion des investissements

2001· article· fr· W332968958 on OpenAlexaff
Gérard Perroulaz, Andreas Ragaz, Hans-Peter Egler, Monika Egger, Susanne Grossmann, Peter Bosshard, Nadine Keim

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnuaire suisse de politique de développement · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEU Law and Policy Analysis
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1.1. Présentation des nouveaux instruments de promotion des investissements La Loi sur la coopération au développement du 19 mars 1976 stipulait déjà (à l’article 6) que la coopération au développement peut revêtir la forme de « mesures en vue d’encourager l’engagement de ressources du secteur privé, telles que les investissements ». Plusieurs documents donnant les orientations générales de l’aide suisse ont depuis réaffirmé et précisé les mesures de coopération susceptibles de soutenir les e...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnuaire suisse de politique de développementSame topicEU Law and Policy AnalysisFrench-language works237,207