MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W332968958 · doi:10.4000/aspd.869

1. Politique du secrétariat d’Etat a l’économie en matière de promotion des investissements

2001· article· fr· W332968958 on OpenAlexaff
Gérard Perroulaz, Andreas Ragaz, Hans-Peter Egler, Monika Egger, Susanne Grossmann, Peter Bosshard, Nadine Keim

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnuaire suisse de politique de développement · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEU Law and Policy Analysis
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1.1. Présentation des nouveaux instruments de promotion des investissements La Loi sur la coopération au développement du 19 mars 1976 stipulait déjà (à l’article 6) que la coopération au développement peut revêtir la forme de « mesures en vue d’encourager l’engagement de ressources du secteur privé, telles que les investissements ». Plusieurs documents donnant les orientations générales de l’aide suisse ont depuis réaffirmé et précisé les mesures de coopération susceptibles de soutenir les e...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.009
Scholarly communication0.0110.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnuaire suisse de politique de développementSame topicEU Law and Policy AnalysisFrench-language works237,207