MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W33304555 · doi:10.1002/ece3.6955

Специфика брендинга в конверсионном производстве

2008· article· en· W33304555 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Данильченко Юрий Васильевич, Бойко Андрей Анатольевич

Bibliographic record

VenueВестник Сибирского государственного аэрокосмического университета им. академика М.Ф. Решетнева · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The relationships between an environmental variable and an ecological response are usually estimated by models fitted through the conditional mean of the response given environmental stress. For example, nonparametric loess and parametric piecewise linear regression model (PLRM) are often used to represent simple to complex nonlinear relationships. In contrast, piecewise linear quantile regression models (PQRM) fitted across various quantiles of the response can reveal nonlinearities in its range of variation across the explanatory variable.We assess the number and positions of candidate breakpoints using loess and compare the relative efficiencies of PLRM and PQRM to quantitatively determine the breakpoints' location and precision. We propose a nonparametric method to generate bootstrap confidence intervals for breakpoints using PQRM and prediction bands for loess and PQRM. We illustrated the applications using data from two aquatic studies suspected to exhibit multiple environmental breakpoints: relating a fish multimetric index of community health (MMI) to agricultural activity in wetlands' adjacent drainage basins; and relating cyanobacterial biomass to total phosphorus concentration in Canadian lakes.Two statistically significant breakpoints were detected in each dataset, demarcating boundaries of three linear segments, each with markedly different slopes. PQRM generated less biased, more accurate, and narrower confidence intervals for the breakpoints and narrower prediction bands than PLRM, especially for small samples and large error variability. In both applications, the relationship between the response and environmental variables was weak/nonsignificant below the lower threshold, strong through the midrange of the environmental gradient, and weak/nonsignificant beyond the upper threshold.We describe several advantages of PQRM over PLRM in characterizing environmental relationships where the scatter of points represents natural environmental variation rather than measurement error. The proposed methodology will be useful for detecting multiple breakpoints in ecological applications where the limits of variation are as important as the conditional mean of a function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.502
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueВестник Сибирского государственного аэрокосмического университета им. академика М.Ф. РешетневаSame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207