MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W333082446 · doi:10.2527/2001.7971868x

Early postnatal plasma concentrations of testicular steroid hormones, pubertal development, and carcass leanness as potential indicators of boar taint in market weight intact male pigs.

2001· article· en· W333082446 on OpenAlexaff
P A Sinclair, E. James Squires, J.I. Raeside

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMeat and Animal Product Quality
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBOARBoar taintHormoneSteroidEndocrinologyInternal medicineBiologyAndrologyAnimal scienceSemenMedicineAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Testicular steroid hormone concentrations in plasma of early postnatal male pigs were compared with plasma steroid hormone concentrations and androstenone concentrations in the fat of pigs at market weight. Positive correlations were found between the concentrations of fat androstenone at market weight and the concentrations of plasma androstenone (r = 0.46; P < 0.01), estrone sulfate (r = 0.42; P < 0.01), and testosterone (r = 0.26; P < 0.05) at market weight. These correlations were not found in animals that had reached an advanced state of pubertal development as judged by high estrone sulfate concentrations in plasma. Significant correlations were observed between plasma testosterone concentrations at market weight and plasma concentrations of androstenone (r = 0.57; P < 0.05), and estrone sulfate (r = 0.49; P < 0.05) in early postnatal animals. However, concentrations of androstenone in the fat of market weight animals were not correlated with plasma concentrations of estrone sulfate, androstenone, or testosterone in early postnatal animals. Plasma concentrations of steroid hormones in early postnatal animals cannot, therefore, be used to predict the potential for boar taint in the same animals at market weight. In market weight animals, there was a negative correlation (r = -0.57; P < 0.01) between backfat thickness and concentrations of androstenone in fat. Animals were subsequently sorted according to backfat thickness into lean and fat groups of animals. There was a strong, negative correlation between back-fat thickness and androstenone concentrations in fat (r = -0.80; P < 0.01), as well as a positive correlation between plasma androstenone and concentrations of androstenone in fat (r = 0.42; P < 0.05) among the lean group of animals. This was not seen in the fat group of animals. This suggests that the accumulation of androstenone from plasma into fat may be affected by the leanness of the pig.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicMeat and Animal Product QualityFrench-language works237,207