MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W33312790 · doi:10.7759/cureus.11390

A study on the prevalence of under-nutrition among the irular tribal adolescent girls in thiruvallur district, tamil nadu, south india.

2014· article· en· W33312790 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R.Nagarani Saravanakumar.P.

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTamilAnthropometryMedicineAnemiaPsychological interventionEnvironmental healthPublic healthCross-sectional studyDemographyCommunity healthMalnutritionPediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Under-nutrition during the adolescence is an important public health problem in developing countries particularly in rural India. There is paucity of data on Under-nutrition among the Tribals wherein early detection prevents adverse health problems Objective: To assess the prevalence of under-nutrition among the Irular adolescent girls in Tamil Nadu. Methods: A community based Cross-sectional study was conducted among 200 Irular girls aged 10 to 19 years in Irularpalayam in Minjur block, Thiruvallur District of Tamil Nadu using the Multi-stage sampling method during March to July 2013. Socio-demographic data, anthropometric measurements, Hemoglobin estimation were recorded and Thinness was defined as BMI < 5th centile (CDC 2000). Anemia was defined as Hb < 12 gm% for non-pregnant girls Results: The prevalence of Thinness was 63.5% with increasing severity with advancing age with statistical significance. Prevalence of Anemia was 58% with increasing severity with age. Majority of 70% had clinical signs of Under-nutrition. Access to Health services was observed to be very low in this community.Conclusion: Under-nutrition in the form of Thinness and Anemia is highly prevalent among the Irular adolescent girls requiring special focus on Health education, nutritional interventions for a healthy productive life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureus→Same topicChild Nutrition and Water Access→French-language works237,207→