MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W333718540

The Quality of Work: A People-Centred Agenda

2000· book· en· W333718540 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Graham S. Lowe

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Entomology and Zoology · 2000
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Quality (philosophy)WorkforcePublic relationsPolitical scienceBusinessEconomic growthEconomicsEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This book addresses some concerns and issues of the workplace in Canada and the expectations of the Canadian workforce. There is a focus on the quality of work and the benefits of high quality work. The social and economic outcomes of high quality work are discussed. It is suggested that high quality work in the future will benefit both employers and individual employees. Chapters included in this book are: The future of work; The crisis in work; What Canadians want from work; The 'new economy'; Education, skills, and the knowledge economy; Youth and work; 'Putting people first'; Workplace innovation; Unions and the quality agenda; Creating a higher quality of work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.477
Threshold uncertainty score0.948

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0110.018
Scholarly communication0.0180.008
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Entomology and ZoologySame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207