Between God and Ubermensch: Viacheslav Ivanovich Ivanov and His Vacillating Struggle with Nietzsche
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two hexagonal-perovskite-structure oxides, 21R Ba<sub>7</sub>Fe<sub>5</sub>Ge<sub>2</sub>O<sub>20</sub> and 12H Ba<sub>6</sub>Fe<sub>3</sub>Ge<sub>3</sub>O<sub>17</sub>, were obtained by synthesis with a high-pressure and high-temperature technique. The Fe-containing hexagonal-perovskite-structure units are sandwiched by nonmagnetic GeO<sub>4</sub> tetrahedral layers in the structures, and thus both compounds show two-dimensional ferrimagnetic behaviors due to intra- and interunit magnetic interactions. 21R Ba<sub>7</sub>Fe<sub>5</sub>Ge<sub>2</sub>O<sub>20</sub> has the ionic formula Ba<sub>7</sub>Fe1<sub>2</sub><sup>3+</sup>Fe2<sup>4+</sup>Fe3<sub>2</sub><sup>4+</sup>Ge4<sub>2</sub><sup>4+</sup>O<sub>20</sub> at room temperature, and unusually high valence Fe<sup>4+</sup> in the trimers undergoes charge disproportionation, Fe2<sup>4+</sup> + 2Fe3<sup>4+</sup> → Fe2<sup>(4+2δ)+</sup> + 2Fe3<sup>(4-δ)+</sup>, at low temperatures. In contrast, 12H Ba<sub>6</sub>Fe<sub>3</sub>Ge<sub>3</sub>O<sub>17</sub> with ionic formula Ba<sub>6</sub>Fe1<sub>2</sub><sup>3+</sup>(Fe2<sub>0.5</sub><sup>4+</sup>Ge2<sub>0.5</sub><sup>4+</sup>)<sub>2</sub>Ge3<sub>2</sub><sup>4+</sup>O<sub>17</sub> does not show a charge transition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it