MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W334423983 · doi:10.4000/lidil.3097

James Archibald et Stéphanie Galligani (dir.), Langue(s) et immigration(s) : société, école, travail, Paris, L’Harmattan, 2009, 289 p.

2010· article· fr· W334423983 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marine Totozani

Bibliographic record

VenueLidil · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Language Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le recueil Langue(s) et immigration(s) : société, école, travail, réunit sous un titre éloquent des contributions d’auteurs français et canadiens appartenant à différents horizons. Il nous place d’emblée au cœur d’un questionnement sur les rapports entre la langue et l’intégration des migrants, qui s’articule autour de deux axes : le rôle de la langue dans l’établissement et l’intégration réussie des migrants au sein des sociétés d’accueil, et la lutte contre les discriminations produites du ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.009
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLidilSame topicFrench Language Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207