MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W33494813 · doi:10.1186/s13287-020-02131-6

'Conversion', in Word you up: winning stories and poems from the 2014 Boroondara Literary Awards (Melbourne: City of Boroondara, 2014), 143-145.

2014· article· en· W33494813 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Duncan Reid

Bibliographic record

VenueStem Cell Research & Therapy · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthOntario Institute for Regenerative Medicine
KeywordsCourageTheme (computing)PoetryLiteratureHistoryLawArt historyClassicsArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 2014 Boroondara Literary Awards, marking the centenary of the start of World War 1, allowed for entries with the theme of Courage in Adversity, commemorating Australia’s involvement in the First World War. There was a further note to the effect that this could mean less conventional forms of courage, on the home front as well as overseas. My story ‘Conversion’ responded to this idea. 'Conversion' is a story about life-long learning. An old man goes to church – for a concert. He doesn’t want to go, but his daughter has asked him come with her, and he knows she’ll be disappointed if he doesn’t. What he experiences is something like a conversion. He’s prompted to reconsider some of his long-held assumptions about life and his relationships with his own long-dead parents. Maybe he’ll even come to know himself a little better. This was the winning story in the ‘Courage In Adversity’: Open Short Story section.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0160.008
Scholarly communication0.0120.006
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0020.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStem Cell Research & TherapySame topicCommonwealth, Australian Politics and FederalismFrench-language works237,207