MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W334965459 · doi:10.48009/2_iis_2007_171-179

ICT USE: THE INFLUENCE OF CULTURAL DIMENSIONS ON THE NEED FOR MEDIA RICHNESS AND TECHNOLOGICAL RICHNESS

2007· article· en· W334965459 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Abdou Illia, Assion Lawson‐Body

Bibliographic record

VenueIssues in Information Systems · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicKnowledge Management and Sharing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpecies richnessInformation and Communications TechnologyEconomic geographyEcologyGeographyComputer scienceBiologyWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Globalization is one of the major forces behind the growing need to know the extent to which culture and context-related variables influence information technology (IT) use.In this study, data collected from Chinese and Canadian managers was used to assess the impact of cultural dimensions on the extent to which people are interested in both media richness and technological features associated with Information and Communication Technologies (ICT).The results showed that there is a significant difference between Canadian and Chinese managers in terms of their interest in media richness.The results also showed that there is no relationship between cultural dimensions and peoples' interest in technological features like storage capacity, data accessibility, and ability to access messages anytime, anywhere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.165
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIssues in Information SystemsSame topicKnowledge Management and SharingFrench-language works237,207