MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W335313713

From Women in Sport to Cultural Critique: A Review of Books about Women in Sport and Physical Culture

2005· review· en· W335313713 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Susan J. Bandy

Bibliographic record

VenueFeminist Press at the City University of New York eBooks · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSports, Gender, and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGender studiesSociologyFeminismContext (archaeology)InstitutionCultural studiesConstruct (python library)Identity (music)Interpretation (philosophy)Physical culturePerspective (graphical)Social scienceAestheticsAnthropologyHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION Scholarly interest in issues that pertain women and sports developed in Canada, England, and the United States at approximately the same time and somewhat earlier than it did in other western countries. Research began in the late 1960s within the context of second-wave feminism and focused primarily on the female athlete. In the late 1970s, the focus of research began shift away from the female athlete toward the concept of gender and a critique of sport and physical culture.' More recently interest has shifted yet again, focusing not on gender as a distinct category but as a dynamic, relational process. It has become a perspective and an interpretation, a way of looking at issues through the lens of gender. Such perspectives have led investigations concerning gender relations and issues of a more transnational nature. By reviewing some of the most influential books that have been written in English, this essay traces the development of ideas in the discourse and gives an overview of the way in which these ideas have transformed our views and extended our understandings of the female athlete and the nature of sport as a cultural institution and cultural construct. The essay will also examine the way in which these books have influenced our views concerning identity and difference in sport that transcend national boundaries and categories of race, class, and gender. In so doing, this essay attempts place these ideas in the context of the development of both feminist theory and theories in sports studies.ii FEMINIST INTEREST IN SPORT AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY As sport historian Roberta Park has written, feminists of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries recognized that physical strength and the right exercise and be physically educated are feminist issues.iii In A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, Mary Wollstonecraft wrote that she wished to persuade women endeavor acquire strength of both mind and body . . . a character as a human being. Further, Wollstonecraft argued that girls should be allowed take the exercises as and then the question of the natural superiority of males could be answered. As Park (1994) noted six decades later, Elizabeth Cady Stanton expressed the same view when writing for The Lily, suggesting that when girls were given the same physical freedoms as boys in romping, swimming, climbing, and playing, they would prove be as physically capable as boys. During Cady Stanton's life, the first books pertaining women and physical activity were written, and these were devoted the development of calisthenics and gymnastics programs for women, which appeared in a number of countries in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.(TM) In the United States, Catharine Beecher's book, Physiology and Calisthenics for Schools and Families, introduced an interest in the physical activity and health of young women in 1856 as programs of physical culture and gymnastics were being developed in the United States and in countries of Western Europe.v More than a century later, with the development of second-wave feminism, Simone de Beauvoir recognized the importance of physical activity as a feminist issue as her predecessors had done. In The Second Sex, De Beauvoir remarked that woman should swim, climb mountain peaks, pilot an airplane, battle against the elements, take risks, go out for adventure, and she will not feel before the world . . . timidity.vi In De Beauvoir's lifetime, the study of women and sport began in earnest in the context of the rebirth of the women's movement and the women's sports movement in North America and Great Britain in the 1960s, as increasing numbers of females entered competitive sports. At this time, physical educators began show interest in the influence of sport on women, and they saw the need analyze the social dimensions of women's participation in sport. EARLIEST RESEARCH CONCERNING WOMEN AND SPORT In 1965, when the discipline of physical education was becoming more academic and theoretically oriented in the United States, the work of Eleanor Metheny opened the way for a more scholarly approach the study of women and sport. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.009
Science and technology studies0.0030.009
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFeminist Press at the City University of New York eBooksSame topicSports, Gender, and SocietyFrench-language works237,207