MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Toezicht op zedendelinquenten

2012· article· nl· W33574634 on OpenAlex
R.P. van der Horst, H.J.M. Schönberger, C.H. de Kogel

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDen Haag · 2012
Typearticle
Languagenl
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDutch Social and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtTheologyPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Momenteel is er een wetswijziging in voorbereiding om levenslang toezicht na intramurale behandeling bij tbs-gestelden die een zedendelict gepleegd hebben mogelijk te maken. Om tot een verantwoorde juridische vormgeving en inhoudelijke invulling van het voorgenomen langdurige extramurale toezicht te komen is het WODC gevraag een drietal onderzoeken te verrichten. De eerste twee onderzoeken zijn inmiddels gepubliceerd. Het betreft: (Wettelijke kaders voor langdurig of levenslang toezicht bij delinquenten in Engeland/Wales, Canada en Duitsland, 2011) en Kenmerken en recidivecijfers van ex-terbeschikkinggestelden met een zedendelict (2012). Dit laatste deelondezoek betreft de effectiviteit van vormen van toezicht en veronderstelde werkzame mechanismen die van belang kunnen zijn bij het inzetten van langdurig toezicht bij zedendelinquenten. De Links naar de vorige twee rapporten zijn te vinden bij: Meer informatie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it