MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W336052792

Introduction: Latin American Diasporas: Common Origins and Different Paths

2014· article· en· W336052792 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Víctor Armony

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian ethnic studies · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American and Latino Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiasporaImmigrationPopulationContext (archaeology)Ethnic groupIdentity (music)Diversity (politics)Latin AmericansCountry of originPolitical scienceEmigrationSociologyGenealogyEthnologyGender studiesGeographyHistoryAnthropologyLawDemography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This issue gathers contributions from Canada, Israel, and Spain regarding the integration of Americans in those countries. Most studies on migrants focus on population movements within or, particularly in the English-language scholarly literature, on their migration towards the United States. Not surprisingly, it is mostly in the latter context that the idea of a diaspora has drawn the attention of researchers, and that the emergence of a pan-ethnic identity in exile has been proposed and discussed. The term Latino --as it refers to a relatively well-defined population subset--is directly connected to the U.S. reality and it reflects historically rooted understandings of ethnicity and minority self-identification and categorization in that country. However, the often-overlooked notion that a diasporic construction can take place in other host societies is certainly worth exploring. Outside the United States, Americans have settled in many regions of the world, but they have created certain migration corridors that are particularly significant, in that they are establishing distinct realities--through an emerging sense of community and by means of shared experiences and aspirations. Americans in Canada, in Israel, and in Spain can claim a common origin, but their Latino-ness will probably take different shapes as they become part and parcel of each host society: being in French (in Quebec) or in Hebrew is different from being in English or in Spanish. Canada, Israel, and Spain are all countries of immigration, but their respective models of diversity-management, the volume and configuration of their immigrant intake, and their political and socioeconomic environment, not to mention the linguistic and cultural framework, create diverging patterns of integration and minority/majority relations. But if each receiving society will foster different ways of carrying and reinterpreting a heritage, can we actually consider this heritage as a common trait of all or most Americans, be they migrants or not? Indeed, includes at least twenty nation-states that, because of their colonial origins, reflect in their institutions and societal organization--albeit in many different ways--a worldview with roots in the Southern European tradition, that of the Greco-Roman world, the Italian Renaissance, the Counter-Reformation, and the Iberian absolutist social order. However, such shared past does not preclude a debate about which countries should be covered by the label Latin Some expansive definitions will encompass the whole hemisphere with the exception of Canada, the United States, and the dependencies and territories belonging to European countries (that is, the geopolitically-driven approach favored by CELAC, the Community of and Caribbean States created in 2011). Other more restrictive definitions will focus on language (Spanish or Portuguese) or on the Hispanic legacy, thus excluding Brazil from the cluster. Geography also is occasionally a factor: Mexico would be a North American country, thus outside the realm of a Latin America spreading over South and Central America. Is Haiti part of America? Even Cuba's place is ambiguous, as the Caribbean is usually seen as a distinct area. It goes without saying that the colonial experience in the Americas involved an extraordinary process of ethnic mixing, cultural amalgamation, and ideological construction, and that the indigenous populations contributed decisively to the process of nation-building, although from a highly subordinate position. But no characterization of America's historical foundations supposes the existence of a monolithically unified civic culture throughout the region or within each country, for that matter. In fact, many studies show the presence of both unique cultural orientations, and the existence of diverging values and attitudes between regions and between social groups. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score0.763

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian ethnic studiesSame topicLatin American and Latino StudiesFrench-language works237,207