MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W33633652 · doi:10.2166/wqrj.2001.005

Laboratory Investigation of Inorganic Fouling of Low Pressure UV Disinfection Lamps

2001· article· en· W33633652 on OpenAlexaff
M. Asrar Sheriff, M. Gehr

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Quality Research Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWastewater Treatment and Reuse
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFoulingChemistryPrecipitationWastewaterSedimentationEnvironmental chemistryFerricPhosphateEnvironmental engineeringInorganic chemistryEnvironmental scienceSedimentMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Iron(III) (mainly dosed as FeCl3) is one of the main inorganic constituents associated with the fouling of UV lamps during disinfection of wastewater. A low pressure mercury lamp UV system was operated under laboratory conditions to assess the effects of heat and UV light on fouling. Iron(III) was dosed at different concentrations and fouling was monitored by measuring the UV irradiance. The potential for ferric phosphate fouling and the effects of organics were also studied. Results showed that fouling did not occur in recirculating systems over 12 days of observation. However, in flow-through systems, the extent and rate of fouling depended on the solution Fe concentration. Furthermore, addition of phosphorus increased the fouling rate. Bulk precipitation appeared to be significant at iron(III) dosing over 3 mg/L. Theoretical predictions of an equilibrium model (MINEQL+) showed similar trends with measured concentrations of soluble Fe and P from batch tests. However, model predictions of temperature effects alone could not account for the observed solids deposition on the quartz sleeve. Bulk precipitation, followed by sedimentation, was considered to be the dominant mechanism at high iron (III) concentrations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.279
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Quality Research JournalSame topicWastewater Treatment and ReuseFrench-language works237,207