MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W336641987

SHOCKED QUARTZ AS AN INDICATOR OF THE LOADING AND RELAXATION CONDITIONS DURING AND AFTER HYPERVELOCITY IMPACT - MICROSTRUCTURAL EVIDENCE FROM CRYSTALLINE TARGET ROCKS OF THE CHARLEVOIX IMPACT STRUCTURE, CANADA.

2003· article· en· W336641987 on OpenAlexaffabout
Claudia A. Trepmann, J. G. Spray

Bibliographic record

VenueLunar and Planetary Science Conference · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypervelocityQuartzImpact structureGeologyElectron backscatter diffractionShock (circulatory)ProjectileDifferential stressShock metamorphismDeformation (meteorology)MineralogyMaterials scienceGrain sizeImpact craterComposite materialMicrostructure
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The loading and relaxation conditions (e.g., pulse duration, pressure, differential stress and temperature) during and after hypervelocity impact are dependent on the velocity, material and size of the projectile, as well as on the material properties of the target rocks, including macroscopic and microscopic structural features (e.g., foliation, grain size, etc.) and shock impedance variation between adjacent phases. The shock effects generated in the target rocks are sensitive to these conditions and can therefore provide important information on the cratering process. The late Devonian Charlevoix impact structure is located 105 km north of Quebec city (47°32’N; 70°18’W) along the north shore of the St. Lawrence River. The topographic expression of the ~55 km diameter complex structure with a prominent central peak is well defined. Shocked quartz from the crystalline target rocks has been studied by optical microscopy, U-stage and scanning electron microscopy, combined with electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD). The shocked quartz crystals reveal planar fractures (PFs) and planar deformation features (PDFs) (Fig. 1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score0.721

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLunar and Planetary Science ConferenceSame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207