Il deficit della regolazione emotivo-affettiva in soggetti affetti da neoplasia cerebrale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studi recenti suggeriscono che l’alessitimia può costituire un sintomo nei pazienti neoplastici, in modo particolare correlato a disturbi psicopatologici come l’ansia e la depressione. Altresì, studi condotti in gruppi di pazienti con specifiche lesioni cerebrali hanno rilevato una correlazione tra alessitimia e alcuni deficit neuropsicologici, particolarmente a carico delle funzioni frontali e delle funzioni visuospaziali. A tale scopo è stato studiato un gruppo di 21 pazienti con neoplasie cerebrali primarie, ai quali è stata presentata la scala di auto-somministrazione per la misurazione dell’alessitimia Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 items (TAS-20). Sono state inoltre valutate una serie di funzioni neurocognitive e psicopatologiche al fine di correlare la presenza/assenza di alessitimia con delle distinte variabili neurocomportamentali e pertanto con specifici correlati neurali.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".