Laparoscopic nissen's fundoplication: retrospective study of 168 cases, long-term follow-up.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery has shown its efficiency since its description by B. Dallemagne in Belgium and T. Geagea in Canada in 1991. As encountered in the laparotomic approach, this technique can be associated with mid- and long-term postoperative side effects. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective study about 168 patients operated for a gastro-esophageal reflux using the Nissen's technique with division of the short gastric vessels through a laparoscopic approach. There were 73 men (43%) and 95 women (57%) with a median age of 44 years (mean: 54 years, range: 17-82). The patients were seen 10 days, one month and three months postoperatively. After one year, they were seen or contacted by phone. The mean follow-up duration was 19.8 months (median: 12 months, range: 0.33-132). RESULTS: The mean operation time was 109 minutes (range: 57-210). There was no death. The postoperative morbidity rate was 5%. 142 patients (84%) had a third month control gastroscopy. 123 patients (86.6%) didn't report any complaint related to their reflux after 3 months. After one year, 166 patients (98.8%) were contacted. A reflux recurrence was reported by 4 patients (2.4%), 157 (94.2%) had no complaints. Our results are similar to those found in the literature published about laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery. In our series, we noted less mechanical complications than in the literature. The choice of the technique and the characteristics of our patients could explain this difference. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic total fundoplication with division of the short gastric vessels is, for most of the authors, the first choice technique in the surgical treatment of the gastro-esophageal reflux.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".