MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Tolerability of Nimesulide Versus Rofecoxib Taken Once a Day in the Treatment of Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis

2003· article· en· W337678692 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mar a Gonz lez

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Therapeutics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNimesulideOsteoarthritisTolerabilityRofecoxibAcetaminophenVisual analogue scaleDosingInternal medicinePhysical therapyAnesthesiaCyclooxygenaseAdverse effectAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UNLABELLED: The treatment of osteoarthritis, a common degenerative joint disease, is focused on the relief of symptoms, mainly pain, and sometimes joint stiffness. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs are considered the treatment of choice in cases where the pain cannot be reduced with acetaminophen. This trial was conducted to compare the effectiveness of 2 nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs taken once daily to relieve the symptoms of osteoarthritis. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of 2 nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, nimesulide versus rofecoxib, given once a day in patients with knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: 114 patients with the diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis were recruited in a randomized, double-blinded fashion, and they received a daily dose of either 300 mg of nimesulide retard or 25 mg of rofecoxib. The effectiveness was evaluated by means of: visual analog scale 0 to 10 cm measured at 0, 15, 30, and 45 minutes after the first dose and then after 2, 3, 15, and 30 days of continuous drug dosing. The quality of life was assessed by the scale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities on days 0, 15, and 30. The patients' opinions and that of the physicians were recorded at the end of the study. RESULTS: The 2 groups of patients were matched for race, sex, menopause status (for females), pathologic antecedents, the duration of osteoarthritis, and the history of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug therapy; however, patients' affected knees could differ in the 2 treatments. The 2 drugs were equally effective in terms of overall improvement of pain and the quality of life; they were equally well tolerated. However, significant differences were found between the 2 drugs in favor of nimesulide in the relief of the pain on days 2, 3, and 30, and in the scale of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index on day 15 and 30. DISCUSSION: In this trial, both medications were effective in improving the pain and the quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis; however, nimesulide, compared with rofecoxib, was quicker in reducing the pain and was more effective on days 2, 3, and 30. Nimesulide was also superior in improving the quality of life after 30 days of treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of TherapeuticsSame topicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsFrench-language works237,207