MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W337882022 · doi:10.5007/1980-3532.2011n6p3

Los archivos de Mayo de 1968: una presentación de la lucha anti-tecnocrática en Mayo de 68 <br>DOI:10.5007/1980-3532.2011n6p3

2012· article· es· W337882022 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Feenberg

Bibliographic record

VenueEm Debate · 2012
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunism, Protests, Social Movements
Canadian institutionsInnovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemocracyHumanitiesPolitical scienceComplaintSocialismSociologyArtLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article introduces the May Events Archive at the library of Simon Fraser University and explores its contents in terms of the role of the idea of self-management in Paris in 1968. The documents in the archive show that the May Events was a politically conscious movement for democratic socialism, contrary to widespread condemnation by conservative intellectuals who argue that students and workers had no positive goals in 1968 but merely engaged in self-indulgent complaint. The article also points out the important role of the middle strata of employees and professionals in the May Events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.320
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEm DebateSame topicCommunism, Protests, Social MovementsFrench-language works237,207