MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W33910743

Maternal coping and adaptation: A case study examination of chronic sorrow in caring for an adolescent with a progressive neurodegenerative disease.

2009· article· en· W33910743 on OpenAlexaff
Amanda Bettle, Margot Latimer

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily and Disability Support Research
Canadian institutionsIzaak Walton Killam Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStressorCoping (psychology)PsychologyFeelingDevelopmental psychologyClinical psychologyDiseasePsychological adaptationMedicineSocial psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A single case study approach was used to examine the maternal experience of chronic sorrow in caring for an adolescent with a progressive neurodegenerative condition. A family systems model was used to examine maternal coping and adaptation. A diagnosis of a childhood neurodegenerative illness will inevitably result in periods of deterioration, increased physical, financial and health care needs. These periods of increased demands result in a build-up of stressors over time. During these different transitions, maternal coping and adaptation have been recognized as important components that affect the health and well-being of the whole family. McCubbin and Patterson's (1983) Double ABCX model of Adjustment and Adaptation was used to explore ongoing maternal coping and adaptation. By using a strengths-based approach, an advanced practice nurse (APN) was able to validate the maternal experience of chronic sorrow and identify factors influencing maternal coping and adaptation. Despite the emotional response of feeling hopeless and helpless, this mother was able to recognize and talk about her strengths and how they have contributed to the health and well-being of the whole family.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.332
Threshold uncertainty score0.296

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicFamily and Disability Support ResearchFrench-language works237,207