MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W339592265

Hizkuntza-gutxiengoen talde-bizindarra, kultura-autonomia eta ongizatea

2008· article· eu· W339592265 on OpenAlex
Richard Y. Bourhis, Rodrigue Landry

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBat: Soziolinguistika aldizkaria · 2008
Typearticle
Languageeu
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicImmigration and Intercultural Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical sciencePhilosophyTheology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hizkuntzaren talde-bizindarrari buruzko ikuspegia eta teoria azaltzen dute egileek artikulu honetan: bizindar objektiboa eta subjektiboa uztartuz, eta Landryren kultura autonomiaren eredua aztertuz, non osagai nagusiak kontrol instituzionala, hurbiltasun soziala eta legitimitate ideologikoa kokatzen diren. Bide horretatik zehazten saiatzen dira zer esku-hartze diren garrantzitsuak hizkuntza-gutxiengoek kultura-autonomia eta babes instituzional handiagoa lortzeko. Amaitzeko, Europako eta Kanadako zenbait hizkuntza-gutxiengoen ongizatea aztertzen dute, arreta berezia jarriz Montreal eta Qebeceko eskualdeetan kokatutako komunitate anglofonoen kasuari.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.418
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it