Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article examine le rôle du cinéma dans l’espace public post-révolutionnaire cubain. Utilisant l’idée de Miriam Hansen selon laquelle le cinéma est une sphère publique alternative, je trace deux espaces ouverts par le cinéma depuis la révolution de 1959 : l’espace littéral produit dans et au travers la projection des films et l’espace symbolique du texte filmique lui-même. Dans la première section de cet essai, je discute de la campagne pour le cinéma mobile des années 1960 et soutiens que le mouvement a contribué à la croissance de la sphère publique en intégrant les ruraux, marginalisés, dans une nation post-industrielle. Dans la seconde partie, je pose la question du cinéma cubain dans le contexte des conditions idéologiques limitées imposées par l’état. Je soutiens que l’on peut identifier des occurrences de « publicness » dans les signes et signaux donnés aux spectateurs dans les films populaires cubains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".