MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W340789747

Dynamical Models of Depth-Dependent Lithospheric Extension at Rifted Continental Margins: Effects of Strong and Weak Lower Crust

2009· article· en· W340789747 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ritske S. Huismans, Christopher Beaumont

Bibliographic record

VenueEGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyLithosphereRiftVolcanoPassive marginCrustMantle (geology)Continental marginContinental crustRift zoneOceanic crustThermal subsidenceSubsidencePetrologyPaleontologyTectonicsStructural basinSubduction
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contrasting end members of volcanic and non-volcanic passive margin formation show a large variability in structural style and associated subsidence history that imply strong variability in the underlying thermo-mechanical conditions at the time of rifting. For instance the Iberia-Newfoundland non-volcanic conjugate margin system has evolved from initial wide to late stage narrow, most probably asymmetric rift, leading to exhumation of mantle lithosphere and sub-lithospheric mantle in a wide ocean-continent transition zone under essentially cold conditions. In contrast rifting in the non-volcanic Central South Atlantic conjugate passive margins resulted in very wide (> 250 km) strongly thinned crustal conjugates which remained close to sea level until break-up providing conditions for the late syn-rift shallow water salt basin, implying high thermal gradients at the time of rifting. Volcanic rifted margins such as in the North and South Atlantic show excess magmatic activity and shallow water conditions at the rift-drift transition implying even higher geothermal gradients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.703
Threshold uncertainty score0.777

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEGU General Assembly Conference AbstractsSame topicGeological and Geophysical Studies WorldwideFrench-language works237,207