MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W340814850

An Application of Spatial-Panel Analysis: Provincial Economic Growth and Logistics in China UNE APPLICATION DE L'ANALYSE DE PANEL SPATIAL: LA CROISSANCE ÉCONOMIQUE PROVINCIALE ET LA LOGISTIQUE EN CHINE

2010· article· fr· W340814850 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicRegional Economic and Spatial Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpatial analysisPanel dataChinaAutocorrelationSpatial econometricsEconometricsEconomicsEconomyEconomic geographyGeographyRegional scienceMathematicsStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: This paper introduces the spatial panel autocorrelation model, utilizes C-D production functions, constructs the spatial econometric model and finally studies the spatial correlativity between provincial economic growth and logistics. By using the spatial package of Matlab software, it verifies the possibility if there is the remarkable autocorrelation of the Chinese provincial economic growth and local logistics. On the base of building the spatial panel model, we research the spatial quantitative autocorrelation of the Chinese provincial economic growth and local logistics. Keywords: economic growth; logistics; spatial panel autocorrelation Resume: Cet article presente le modele d'autocorrelation de panel spatial, utilise les fonctions de production de C-D, construit le modele econometrique spatial et enfin etudie la correlativite spatiale entre la croissance economique provinciale et la logistique. En utilisant le paquet spatial de logiciel Matlab, il verifie la possibilite de l'existence d'une autocorrelation remarquable de la croissance economique provinciale chinoise et la logistique locale. Sur la base de la construction d'un modele de panel spatial, nous etudions l'autocorrelation spatiale quantitative de la croissance economique provinciale chinoise et la logistique locale. Mots-cles: croissance economique; logistique; autocorrelation de panel spatial (ProQuest: ... denotes formula omitted.) Modern economic growth depends strongly on logistics. Logistics has become one of the most important factors to promote economic growth, adjust industrial layout and drive the evolution of economic spatial structure. Previous studies of the relationship between economic growth and logistics, limited in time series, which ignored the differences between locations. This paper introduces the spatial factor into a unified analytical framework, considers not only the spatial heterogeneity but also spatial correlation between economic growth and logistics. This paper uses individual fixed-effect model as the basic panel-data model, and uses latest spatial panel-data model to study the correlation between provincial economic growth and local logistics in China. 1. SPATIAL-PANEL MODEL AND CORRELATION TEST 1.1 Spatial-panel Models Spatial effects of the spatial econometrics include spatial autocorrelation and spatial differences. The former is the correlation of the observations between a regional sample and other regional samples. The latter is the spatial-effect non-uniform at the regional level caused by the heterogeneity of spatial units (Anselin, 1988a). Spatial autocorrelation in the spatial autoregressive model is reflected in the error term and the lagged item of dependent variable. Therefore there are two basic spatial econometric models, one is Spatial Auto Regressive Model (SAR), the other is Spatial Error Model (SEM), and the basic formulas of two models are: Spatial Auto Regressive Model (SAR): y = pWNy + ρW^sub N^y + X'β+ e (1) Spatial Error Model (SEM): y = X'β+ μ μ = λW^sub N^ μ+ 7egr; (2) y is the dependent variable, X is the vector of independent variables (including constant term), s is variable factors, ? is spatial regression coefficients, ? is spatial autocorrelation coefficients, e is the error components obeying the normal distribution, Wn is the spatial matrix of ? x ? (? is the number of region), the weight coefficient can defined on actual conditions. The above-mentioned model is a model for the cross-sectional data. In order to apply it to panel data, we need to change the model to meet the basic formula of panel data model. This paper uses individual fixed-effect model (Elhorst 2003). The model controls two kinds of non-observable effects: spatial fixed-effect and time fixed-effect, the former is the effect of background variables which changed with the location, but no changed with time (such as economic structure and natural endowments, etc. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.379
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it