MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W341595133 · doi:10.1079/9780851994444.0119

Active living for people with disabilities: Toward the concept of equality of well-being and human existentialism (authenticity).

2000· book-chapter· en· W341595133 on OpenAlex
J. Levy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCABI Publishing eBooks · 2000
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Policies
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityVanier College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPremiseExistentialismHuman beingEnvironmental ethicsSocial psychologyPsychologySociologyEpistemologyPolitical scienceHumanityLawPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concept of equality of wellbeing and authenticity is defined and related to the principles of active living for working with people with disabilities. It is argued that the concept is based on the premise that all human beings, in spite of their differences, are entitled to be considered and respected as equals and have the right to participate in the social, cultural, educational, sport and economic life of a society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it