Edward Winslow - Témoin oculaire de l'histoire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Si les historiens s’interessent particulierement a Edward Winslow, c’est qu’il a participe a certains des moments historiques les plus marquants de l’Amerique du Nord, dont la Revolution americaine, la migration des loyalistes et la fondation du Nouveau-Brunswick en 1784. Epistolier prolifique et exceptionnel, il a eu la prevoyance de conserver une grande partie de sa correspondance et des documents associes aux diverses fonctions administratives qu’il a exercees jusqu’a son deces a l’âge de 70 ans en 1815. Il est en effet permis de croire que les documents de la famille Winslow aux Archives de l’Universite du Nouveau-Brunswick constituent la plus riche collection de documents loyalistes du monde. Meme si la position sociale et l’education de Winslow ne sont certainement pas celles du loyaliste moyen, ces documents permettent de mieux connaitre les difficultes que les loyalistes ont du surmonter et les reves qu’ils avaient pour la nouvelle colonie du Nouveau-Brunswick.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".