Romantic Relations Among Adolescent Parents
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter is organized around three goals. First, using data from a longitudinal study of adolescent mothers and their partners, the authors examine whether the quality of a young expectant couple's relationship is relevant to how each parent adjusts to the first year of parenthood. For the purposes of this chapter, "adjustment to parenthood" is defined in terms of (a) the parent's level of stress associated with parenting tasks and roles and (b) the status of the couple's relationship one year following childbirth. Second, the authors describe the interpersonal functioning of expectant adolescent couples, focusing on the association between each partner's subjective appraisal of the relationship and his or her observed interpersonal behavior. More specifically, they clarify the relationship between how young expectant parents feel about each other and how they behave toward one another. Finally, based on findings from the Young Parenthood Project, the authors discuss some general guidelines for intervention efforts designed to improve the relationships of expectant adolescent couples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it