MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W34520770 · doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119954

Le Code de droit canonique. Un droit positif universel dans le respect des libertés fondamentales.

2001· article· en· W34520770 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
André Albert Morin

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue générale de droit · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheology and Canon Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhysicsPhilosophyHumanitiesPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

HER2-positive breast cancer (HER2-BC) shows the over-expression of tyrosine kinase receptor EphB4 associated with poor disease prognosis. E-cadherin is found as a survival factor in multiple models of breast cancer by suppressing reactive oxygen-mediated apoptosis. This study confirmed that both HER2 and EphB4 are positively correlated with E-cadherin in HER2-BC. Inhibition of HER2 or EphB4 is discovered to induce ROS-dependent apoptosis by decreasing E-cadherin expression in SKBR3 and MDA-MB-453 cells. TAD1822-7 (TAD), a novel biphenyl urea taspine derivative, exhibits good growth inhibition, apoptosis induction and ROS accumulation effects on SKBR3 and MDA-MB-453 cells. Mechanistic investigation revealed that TAD blockades both EphB4 positive signal transduction and activation of HER2 signal transduction, thereby suppressing E-cadherin/TGF-β/p-Smad2/3 signaling axis to elicit ROS-dependent endogenous mitochondrial apoptosis. Together, these findings not only provide a new approach for HER2-BC therapy but also increase our understanding of the regulating effect of E-cadherin by HER2 and EphB4 in ROS-mediated apoptosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.294
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue générale de droitSame topicTheology and Canon Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207