Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bien que Weber n'ait guère utilisé le terme, la question de l'idéologie est au centre de son œuvre; mais alors qu'une tradition, peu fondée, réduit ses positions à un idéalisme inspiré d'un anti-marxisme obsessif, il est clair que les préoccupations de notre auteur sont ailleurs, au-delà d'un choix matérialiste ou spiritualiste du "facteur dominant". Une fois posé le principe selon lequel une idéologie peut, au même titre que n'importe quel autre "élément singulier" jouer, socialement, le rôle de cause ou celui de conséquence, Weber s'interroge essentiellement sur la nature d'une méthodologie susceptible de désidéologiser les "sciences de la réalité concrète"; la puissance de ses conceptions ne le conduit pourtant pas au delà d'un "jugement de possibilité objective". Le chercheur, comme l'agent social, marche davantage à la valeur qu'à la rationalité ; le reconnaître constitue un des facteurs essentiels du développement de notre discipline.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.047 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".