MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W346577181

Development of an E-Prime Based Computer Simulation of an Interactive Human Rights Violation Negotiation Script (Developpement d'un Programme de Simulation par Ordinateur Fonde sur le Logiciel E Prime pour la Negociation Interactive en cas de Violation des Droits de la Personne)

2010· article· fr· W346577181 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Courtney D. Hall, Cheryl Karthaus, Barbara Adams, Brian G Mangan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean and International Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNegotiationPrime (order theory)Computer scienceInteractive simulationPolitical scienceSimulationLawMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract : This report describes the method of developing an E-Prime computer simulation of an interactive Human Rights Violation (HRV) negotiation. An HRV negotiation script was originally developed under the PWGSC Contract No. W7711-007893/001/TOR Callup No. 7893-12. The HRV negotiation script was designed based on a training scenario developed by the Canadian Forces (CF) for use at the Peace Support Training Centre (PSTC) at Canadian Forces Base (CFB) Kingston. The computer simulation developed in this project is intended to be used for future research and as a possible training platform for use at the PSTC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEuropean and International Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207