MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Microvascular oxygen transport in obese ZDF rats: an early model of type II diabetes

2008· article· en· W34714849 on OpenAlexaff
Amina Benlamri, Stephanie Milkovich, Dylan Burger, Qingping Feng, Daniel Goldman, Christopher R. Ellis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood properties and coagulation
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsHematocritInternal medicineEndocrinologyHemoglobinHemodynamicsOxygen transportType 2 diabetesDiabetes mellitusMedicineSkeletal muscleOxygenationGlucose transporterChemistryOxygenInsulin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sprague et al. (Diabetes 2006) reported impaired ATP release from human red blood cells (RBC) with type II diabetes that may contribute to impaired regulation of O 2 delivery. Our goal was to quantify O 2 transport in skeletal muscle of obese ZDF‐370 rats. Using dual wavelength intravital video microscopy we measured hemodynamics (RBC velocity, RBC supply rate, hematocrit) and RBC oxygen saturation in capillaries of extensor digitorum longus muscle as well as capillary density, glucose, TNF‐ α levels, arterial blood gases, arterial hemoglobin and hematocrit levels. Results reported as mean±SD. Two groups, 7 lean ZDF‐380 rats (179±13 g) and 8 obese ZDF‐370 rats (240±10 g), were studied at 7 weeks. Both glucose and TNF‐ α levels were elevated in the obese group compared to lean (glucose: 12.3±5.1 vs 6.8±0.6 mmol/L; TNF‐α: 112±43 vs 19±9 pg/mol). There were no significant differences in total capillary density. RBC supply rate was significantly decreased in obese rats (7.2±1.1 vs 9.0±1.8 RBC/s; p < 0.05); other hemodynamic parameters were unchanged (obese vs lean: velocity 130±26 vs 157±29 μm/sRBC, Hct 14.6±3.3 vs 15.3±1.6 %). There was a trend for decreased O 2 saturation in the obese group (54±16% vs 64±5%; p = 0.19). The lower RBC supply rate and O 2 saturations suggest the start of impaired regulation of O 2 transport in this early diabetic model. Supported by NIH grant (HL‐089125) and a CIHR operating grant to Ellis & Goldman.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicBlood properties and coagulationFrench-language works237,207