Stratigraphy of the Kazusa Group, Boso Peninsula: An expanded and highly-resolved marine sedimentary record from the Lower and Middle Pleistocene of central Japan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Major climatic reorganizations, including changes in the nature of glacial–interglacial cycles through the Pleistocene, are a key issue for improving the understanding of Earth's climate system. Highly resolved marine sedimentary records are essential to reconstruct the details of these past climatic changes and investigate the mechanisms responsible for them. The Kazusa Group, located in the central part of the Japanese island chain, is well-exposed and contains a remarkably continuous and thick, deep- and shallow-water marine sedimentary succession. This group also contains well-preserved marine microfossils , pollen, paleomagnetic reversal events, geochemical signatures, and a large number of tephra beds. These features allow us to establish a robust chronological and stratigraphic framework for the Kazusa Group, and provide a rare opportunity to study oceanic and terrestrial climatic and environmental changes at high resolution especially through the Lower and lower Middle Pleistocene. In the Boso Peninsula, Chiba Prefecture, the Kazusa Group is deeply incised, yielding spectacular river-cut exposures. The Matuyama–Brunhes paleomagnetic reversal is observed immediately above the widespread Byakubi-E (Byk-E) tephra in the Chiba composite section within the Kokumoto Formation (Kazusa Group). Because the Matuyama–Brunhes boundary customarily serves as the primary guide for the Lower–Middle Pleistocene Subseries boundary, the Chiba composite section is considered an excellent candidate for its global boundary stratotype section and point (GSSP). This study reviews the published data for the Kazusa Group (hitherto almost exclusively in Japanese) in order to place the Chiba composite section within its broader depositional and chronostratigraphic context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".