MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W34773730 · doi:10.1515/cclm-2021-0651

Young stellar populations in the solar neighbourhood

2006· article· en· W34773730 on OpenAlexfundno aff
J. López‐Santiago, G. Micela, S. Sciortino, F. Favata

Bibliographic record

VenueMmSAI · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsGalaxyROSATAstronomyStarsStar formationStellar populationSky

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stellar X-ray surveys play an important role in understanding the star formation history in our Galaxy in the last billion years (the scale time of coronal activity evolution). In particular, the comparison of observed counts in a given sky direction with predictions by Galactic models can put constraints on the spatial distribution and stellar birthrate of stellar populations. We present the results of our study of the stellar content of the Galaxy in the Solar vicinity using the results of the XMM-Newton Bright Serendipitous Survey (XBSS) Bright Source Sample (BSS) and the ROSAT North Ecliptic Pole survey (NEP). We have used the computational model XCOUNT for predicting the number of coronal sources and their spectral type distribution in the surveyed area. The comparison of the predictions with the observations supports a scenario with an increasing stellar formation rate during the last billion years. Nevertheless, we observe an excess of dwarf FGK stars in the observations, which can be due to both the existence of a young stellar population or to a number of M stars in binary systems with a yellow primary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMmSAI→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→