Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori is the most prevalent bacterial infection, affecting half of the world's population, with a high morbidity and mortality rate.<sup>1,2</sup> Several invasive and noninvasive testing procedures are available, and their selective use serves the specific needs of diverse clinical scenarios. For gastric cancer prevention, mass screening is necessary and requires a noninvasive, rapid, accurate and cost-effective test. For this purpose H pylori serology currently seems to be the preferred noninvasive diagnostic method. Population-based testing and treatment for H pylori is cost effective in high-risk countries, but less effective in low- and medium-risk countries.<sup>3,4</sup> Many serologic tests are available on the market, with inconsistent performance often being observed. Therefore, international guidelines recommend considering only serologic tests with high accuracy that have been validated in the respective local populations. To date, no rapid point-of-care test (POCT) has reached a sufficient degree of accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it